It doesn't help that most of the rainbow-stickered movies have an overtly sexual theme, to the point where those stickers tend to imply "porn." I'm sure that the primary intent is to inform gay clients that a particular film might interest them, but I can also see the sticker being a type of stigma: if a film has that sticker on it, you're bound to assume that ONLY homosexuals will be interested in it. So it was weird for me when I picked up " Cthulhu" in the new releases and saw that it had the "gay sticker" on it. What's this? A queer adaptation of a cheesy H.P. Lovecraft story? I would have rented it anyway but the sticker made me doubly curious.
Packrat gay furry porn game movie#
I hoped that the movie was one in which the protagonist just HAPPENED to be gay - as opposed to the type of film I'd expect based on the rainbow sticker - and I was pleasantly surprised because that's exactly what it was. The plot of the movie wasn't particularly interesting.if you've read Lovecraft's work and you recognize how it could merge with environmental and political apocalypse, then you won't be surprised. What IS interesting, however, is how the sexuality of the protagonist is generally unimportant it is not more explicitly "gay" than any other movie is explicitly "straight." Where a gay theme HAS been introduced, however, is the VERY interesting subject of a gay protagonist "coming home" to the inbred small town he ran away from, as Lovecraft's work tended to use the "coming home" theme as part of the horror. There is also a subplot about the desires of the protagonist's family to produce an heir.
Packrat gay furry porn game free#
There are two really wonderful things about "Cthulhu": the overall tone (lighting, music) and the totally natural dialog, which is mostly free of cliche. Jason Cottle is an excellent actor, and - surprisingly for such a low-budget movie - everybody else is top-notch as well. "Cthulhu" could have been really, really good.
![packrat gay furry porn game packrat gay furry porn game](http://cdn.pastemagazine.com/www/articles/2015/10/16/armello3.jpg)
Why isn't it? Because it's disconnected and awkward. And they simply didn't have the budget for any "pay off" scenes. They did the best thing they could possibly have done to sidle around the need for expensive effects - relying on mood, uncertainty, and quick edits to sell the story - but horror movies really DO need a bit more than that. I listened to some of the commentary and it's disheartening to hear Grant Cogswell and Dan Gildark (the writer and director) be so crushingly disappointed with their own movie.
![packrat gay furry porn game packrat gay furry porn game](https://i.pinimg.com/736x/15/34/23/153423219ce65ca7cd368f0c2a76b4db.jpg)
I wanted to call them up and reassure them that the film was FAR better than they'd given it credit for.